Summaries with Psychology and Science (LU) - Coursetool

  Tools

De hele tekst op deze pagina lezen? Alle JoHo tools gebruiken? Sluit je dan aan bij JoHo en log in!
 

Aansluiten bij JoHo als abonnee of donateur

The world of JoHo footer met landenkaart

Coursteool for JoHo subscribers

 

Course: Psychology and Science - Leiden University

Studytools: Summaries per chapter– ExamTests per chapter

Mededelingen en laatste stand van tool, wijzer, vak of boek

Study Tools

Published

  • Booksummary with all chapters of Philosophy of Science by Van der Velde.
  • Booksummary with all chapters of Critical Thinking by Moore & Parker.

 

Test Tools

Published

  • ExamTests with all chapters of Critical Thinking by Moore & Parker.

 

Tools in Print

Published

  • Literature summary with the course Psychology and Science.

Booksummary per chapter

Summaries per chapter with the 1st edition of Philosophy of Science and Logic by Van der Velde - Bundle

Summaries per chapter with the 1st edition of Philosophy of Science and Logic by Van der Velde - Bundle

What is the relationship between psychology and science? - Chapter 1

What is the relationship between psychology and science? - Chapter 1

Psychology differs from other sciences because it focuses on humans. This summary discusses the similarities between psychology and other sciences. There is no one-sided method for scientific research. For example, it is also different whether someone works as a psychologist in science or as a psychologist in a therapeutic setting. 

Psychology differs from other sciences because the information from the research cannot be generalized to the same extent. It cannot be said that certain things 'will always go this way' because psychology depends on human behaviour. However, generalizing information is often used within psychology. This is linked to Watson's positivism. 

How can logical reasoning be used in psychology? This is further explained in the summary, together with the problems associated with this method.

Is psychology reliable enough as a science?

Because of the replication crisis and fraud in psychological research, psychology is not always considered reliable. Results of psychological research are often described in significance with a level of 5%. An experimental condition is then compared with a control condition. 

With a significance of 5% there is still a 5% chance that the discovered effect does not actually exist. The results will be submitted to a scientific journal. A peer review is then carried out. This is used to test the reliability. This can also be done by replication. In doing so, a study is repeated. This is very often not published or cited by other studies. 

However, due to fraud during research, it is becoming increasingly important to look critically at the results. Research by Kahneman showed that 50-70% of the psychological tests could not be replicated. How can research be used when it cannot be replicated? It is therefore important to find out how you can use it. 

When more statistical analyses are carried out, the chance of a false effect increases. This is because you have twice a 95% chance that no effect will be found. 1 - 0,95 x 0,95 = 0,10. This means that you then have a 10% chance of a false positive effect. It is therefore important that as few statistical analyses as possible are made during a study. This effect increases the more often it is done. It is therefore important not to search too much for a significant effect. An additional problem is that many scientific journals only report significant results. 

Fraud is also a problem within psychological research. The best-known example is Stapel's research. It turned out that he had made up the results of various studies. All the checks had therefore not helped to bring this to light earlier. So, it is important to always be critical and to also investigate from falsification rather than verification.

How was the fabric built up?

All subjects in the fabric are related to each other. Logical Positivism will be discussed. Empiricism has played a role in this. This came about through Francis Bacon (1600) from the empirical model. It then changed via Locke (1700) to the Positivism of Auguste (1850). Eventually the Logical Positivism originated from this. This is based on verification. Later on, the subjects of falsification, post-positivism and the history of science will also be discussed. 

What is Logical Positivism? - Chapter 2
What is the connection between Popper and falsification? - Chapter 3
What was the contribution of Kuhn and Feyerabend? - Chapter 4
What is the relationship between Lakatos and scientific programs? - Chapter 5
What is logic? - Chapter 6
Summaries per chapter with the 13th edition of Critical Thinking van Moore & Parker - Bundle

Summaries per chapter with the 13th edition of Critical Thinking van Moore & Parker - Bundle

Why is critical thinking important? - Chapter 1

Why is critical thinking important? - Chapter 1

It is important for people to think critically so that they can make good choices. People often don't realize how irrational some of the decisions they make are. Critical thinking is thinking that criticizes. Critical thinking is to evaluate something against a certain standard. One of the most important things anyone can criticize is reasoning. Reasoning comes into play when people:

  • Form an opinion.
  • Make a judgment.
  • Come to a decision.
  • Develop plans.
  • Propose hypotheses, etc.

Logic is used to determine whether a statement is true, whether the reasoning is correct, and whether we can draw a connection. In this case, it is not about making up statements, but about evaluating (the correctness of) statements that have been made in order to ultimately form the correct conclusions.

To achieve this, people evaluate their thinking on the basis of rationality. When they understand how to think critically, they can use this knowledge to be critical of multiple topics that are important in everyday life. It is also important to remember that criticizing other people's ideas does not mean that they are attacked, but that the logic is sought in something. In addition, criticizing someone is not always an example of critical thinking. One can criticize without thinking about it.

When someone comes to a conclusion, they have a belief. A belief is propositional. That means it is either true or false. A belief is the same as a judgment and an opinion. When a belief is used in an explanatory sense, it produces an assertion as a result. Claims can be considered critically.

A distinction must be made between objective claims and subjective judgments. An objective claim has the following characteristic: whether something is true or false is independent of a person's belief as to whether it is true or false. Objective claims are true or false, but this is not always known. A subjective judgment, on the other hand, is not independent of whether someone thinks it is true or false. Many statements contain both objective and non-objective elements.

A subjective judgment is always true. For this reason, it does not make sense to label subjective judgments in terms of probability. In addition, it cannot be seen as something that can be supported by evidence. Evidence is something that increases the likelihood of an assertion. Many objective claims cannot be supported with evidence either.

Some opinions are not subjective judgments because their truth or falsehood is independent of what people think is true or false. Objective opinions can also be called factual opinions. However, this does not mean that factual opinions are always true.

Relativism is the idea that the "truth" of things is related to culture.

Moral subjectivism takes as its starting point that the moral assessment of something as right or wrong is entirely subjective.

What are issues?

Issues are questions. One issue is whether a statement is true or false. Some issues are objective and some are subjective. The first thing that comes with critical thinking is determining what the issue actually is. Sometimes it is difficult to determine exactly what the claim is (and what the associated issue is). This could be because someone is using difficult terms or someone is deliberately not wanting to clarify his or her claim.

What are arguments?

An argument is a reason presented to prove that a statement is true. A statement that is used as a reason to prove that another statement is true is called a premise. The statement that a premise provides evidence for is called the conclusion of an argument.

Whether an argument is good depends on whether a premise actually supports the conclusion of the argument. This is only possible if the premise is true. A second criterion is therefore that the premise must be relevant to the conclusion. This means that the premise must be related to the conclusion in such a way that the premise increases the chance that the conclusion is correct. It's important to remember that sometimes it may seem like someone is making an argument when they aren't. An argument is not a summary of facts. You can recognize an argument if it is used to prove or support a claim.

What are Cognitive Biases?

Belief formation is also influenced by unconscious features of human psychology, so-called cognitive biases. These biases influence the way information is processed. A few of these biases are:

  • Belief bias: This is the tendency to judge reasoning based on the credibility of the conclusion. When an illogical argument is followed by a credible conclusion, people are more likely to believe it than a logical argument with a conclusion that seems implausible.
  • Confirmation bias: This is the tendency to put more weight on evidence that supports our own ideas.
  • Heuristics: These are general rules that we unconsciously use when estimating probabilities. An example is the availability heuristic. In this case, the probability that something will happen is unconsciously based on data that is best available in memory. As a result, the probability is often overestimated or underestimated. This probably also explains how easily it is to make the mistake of generalizing based on an anecdote. The availability heuristic is also related to the false consensus effect. This concerns the tendency to assume that our attitudes and the attitudes in the environment are shared by the larger society.
  • Bandwagon effect: this is the tendency to attune one's own thinking to what others (seem to) think.
  • Negativity bias: people are more sensitive to negative information than positive information and remember it faster. This bias also plays a role in loss aversion, where people are more focused on avoiding loss than gaining profit.
  • In-group bias: this is the tendency to perceive the members who do not belong to the own group (out-group) as different and wrong, and the members of the own group (in-group) as good and correct.
  • Fundamental Attribution Error: T his is the tendency to attribute behavior directly to a person's personality, without regard to context and situation.
  • Obedience to Authority: This is the tendency for people to blindly obey the commands of the authority.
  • Overconfidence Effect: This is self-deception. For example, if someone estimates the percentage of their correct answers on a topic, the estimate will likely be on the high side - at least if the questions are difficult or the topic is unknown.
  • Better-than-average illusion: The tendency for people to judge themselves better than the average in some areas.

Critical thinking helps to spot substandard substantiation or cover up mistakes. It doesn't say what the truth is.

What two ways of reasoning are there? - Chapter 2
How do you write a good text? - Chapter 3
When is something credible? - Chapter 4
How does persuasion work? - Chapter 5
How does relevance work? - Chapter 6
What are inductive thinking errors? - Chapter 7
What formal errors of thought are there? - Chapter 8
Which deductive arguments are there? - Chapter 9
What other deductive arguments are there? - Chapter 10
What is Inductive Reasoning? - Chapter 11
What is the moral, legal, and ethical reasoning? - Chapter 12
JoHo nieuwsupdates voor inspiratie, motivatie en nieuwe ervaringen: winter 23/24

Projecten, Studiehulp en tools:

  • Contentietools: wie in deze dagen verwonderd om zich heen kijkt kan wellicht terecht op de pagina's over tolerantie en verdraagzaamheid en over empathie en begrip, mocht dat niet voldoende helpen check dan eens de pagina over het omgaan met stress of neem de vluchtroute via activiteit en avontuur in het buitenland.
  • Competentietools: voor meer werkplezier en energie en voor betere prestaties tijdens studie of werk kan je gebruik maken van de pagina's voor vaardigheden en competenties.
  • Samenvattingen: de studiehulp voor Rechten & Juridische opleidingen is sinds de zomer van 2023 volledig te vinden op JoHo WorldSupporter.org. Voor de studies Pedagogiek en Psychologie kan je ook in 2024 nog op JoHo.org terecht.
  • Projecten: sinds het begin van 2023 is Bless the Children, samen met JoHo, weer begonnen om de slum tours nieuw leven in te blazen na de langdurige coronastop. Inmiddels draaien de sloppentours weer volop en worden er weer nieuwe tourmoeders uit deze sloppen opgeleid om de tours te gaan leiden. In het najaar van 2023 is ook een aantal grote dozen met JoHo reiskringloop materialen naar de Filipijnen verscheept. Bless the Children heeft daarmee in het net geopende kantoortje in Baseco, waar de sloppentour eindigt, een weggeef- en kringloopwinkel geopend.

Vacatures, Verzekeringe en vertrek naar buitenland:

World of JoHo:

  • Leiden: de verbouwing van het Leidse JoHo pand loopt lichte vertraging op, maar nadert het einde. Naar verwachting zullen eind februari de deuren weer geopend kunnen worden.
  • Den Haag: aangezien het monumentale JoHo pand in Den Haag door de gemeente noodgedwongen wordt afgebroken en herbouwd, zal JoHo gedurende die periode gehuisvest zijn in de Leidse vestiging.
  • Medewerkers: met name op het gebied van studiehulpcoördinatie, internationale samenwerking en internationale verzekeringen wordt nog gezocht naar versterking!

Nieuws en jaaroverzicht 2023 -2024

  

  

Exams and tests

   

    

   

Samenvattingen en studiehulp per gerelateerde opleiding